propertylist

PA/01127/20: change use of approved Class 4B shops in Sliema

Nos. 109, 110, 112, 113, 114, Triq Manwel Dimech, Sliema

To change use of approved Class 4B shops at ground floor into a Class 2C language school, to sanction increase of 1 parking bay at underground parking level and minor changes to basement parking levels, to propose a decrease amount of residential units from 16 to 14, to propose to extend setback floor level and to propose to increase guesthouse rooms from 19 to 29, different to approved PA 07282/17 (Redevelopment of existing properties including partial demolition of properties nos.109/110 and minor external alterations to existing retained facade, demolition of existing bank branch no.112 and retention of existing cornices and Maltese timber balcony (to be reinstated), demolition of properties nos. 113/114 and retention of existing Maltese timber balcony and construction of development composed of 2 Class 4B retail outlets at ground floor, including new shop signs, with overlying 16 residential units and Class 3A guesthouse containing 19 rooms and underlying underground parking area containing 27 closed onecar garages and 9 parking bays).

Status
Status being checked
Location
Nos. 109, 110, 112, 113, 114, Triq Manwel Dimech, Sliema
Locality
Sliema
Applicant
S&M Properties Ltd Attn: Samuel David Bugeja
Perit
Perit Antoine Zammit
Type of works
Sanctioning
Residential units
14

Case details on the Planning Authority website

Plans, case officer report and decision on eapps

Planning activity around Nos. 109, 110, 112, 113, 114, Triq Manwel Dimech, Sliema

429 other applications within 300 m: 262 granted, 8 refused, 55 pending. 97% of decided applications nearby were granted. Tallest granted nearby: 16 floors (PA/01122/25).

On Triq Manwel Dimech: 70 other applications, 40 granted and 2 refused; granted buildings are typically 4 floors, the tallest 16. Periti active on this street: Ruben Sciortino, MASStudio, Colin Zammit, Matthew Gauci, Joseph Bondin.

Approval estimate for sanctioning applications like this here: about 95% (likely range 68–100%, medium reliability, from 94 comparable decisions nearby). Indicative only. It's based on decisions for similar nearby applications, not on the drawings or the case officer's report; it gets better as documents are added from eapps.

More by Antoine Zammit

All applications by Antoine Zammit

All planning applications in Sliema