propertylist

PA/04212/25: internal and external alterations to existing and in Marsaskala

Former Jakarta Restaurant (current vacant premises), Triq tal-Gardiel c/w, Triq il-Qaliet, Marsascala

Proposed internal and external alterations to existing and approved Class 4D premises in PA922/11 permit including separation from ground floor, internal re-design and change of use to a three bedroom apartment at first floor; proposed internal re-design including relocation of restaurant kitchen and other amenities at ground floor; proposed replacement of enclosed front-garden roof with a light-weight material; proposed re-design of elevations including Class 4D signage; proposed chimney flue pipe from ground floor till roof level; and proposed correction of existing alignments at ground, first floor and common area facade at all floors.

Status
Granted (This application has been approved by Planning Board / Commission.)
Location
Former Jakarta Restaurant (current vacant premises), Triq tal-Gardiel c/w, Triq il-Qaliet, Marsascala
Locality
Marsaskala
Applicant
Zafer Palabiyik
Perit
Perit Adam Pace
Application type
Full development permission
Zone
Within Development Zone
Type of works
Change of Use
Residential units
1
Received
6 March 2025
Validated
25 June 2025
Published
25 June 2025
Comments close
25 July 2025
Recommendation
Grant Permission
Decision
Grant Permission
Decision date
18 September 2025
Permit expires
29 October 2030

Case details on the Planning Authority website

Plans, case officer report and decision on eapps

Planning activity around Former Jakarta Restaurant (current vacant premises), Triq tal-Gardiel c/w, Triq il-Qaliet, Marsascala

132 other applications within 300 m: 86 granted, 3 refused, 13 pending. 97% of decided applications nearby were granted. Tallest granted nearby: 6 floors (PA/03418/24).

On Triq tal-Gardiel: 21 other applications, 13 granted and 0 refused. Periti active on this street: Andrew Vinci, Alistair Avallone, Albert Spiteri, Abel Cassar De Gabriele.

Approval estimate for change of use applications like this here: about 93% (likely range 63–100%, low reliability, from 11 comparable decisions nearby). Indicative only. It's based on decisions for similar nearby applications, not on the drawings or the case officer's report; it gets better as documents are added from eapps.

More by Adam Pace

All applications by Adam Pace

More from Zafer Palabiyik

All planning applications in Marsaskala