propertylist

PA/04838/26: Further to the approved PA/06780/25 concerning the in Balzan

67, Triq it-Tliet Knejjes and, Wied Hal Balzan, Buontempo Estate, Balzan

Further to the approved PA/06780/25 concerning the main building, the proposal includes the sanctioning of the existing site survey; the restoration of the main façade; the removal of existing trees;the installation of soffits; the extension of the approved lift to roof level; the relocation of the existing fireplace from first-floor level to ground-floor level, together with the addition of a chimney at roof level.Additional interventions comprise the construction of an en-suite bathroom at first-floor level within the existing balcony, the relocation of the solar panels at lower roof level, and the restoration and change in colour of the existing wrought iron gates. Further to the approved DN/00829/25, the proposal concerning the smaller building includes the change of use from Class 2C (classroom) to Class 1, together with the sanctioning of the building following the as-built survey.

Status
Pending (Awaiting Recommendation)
Location
67, Triq it-Tliet Knejjes and, Wied Hal Balzan, Buontempo Estate, Balzan
Locality
Balzan
Applicant
Vivien McLean
Perit
Perit Mark Arrigo
Application type
Full development permission
Zone
Within Development Zone
Type of works
Sanctioning
Received
6 April 2026
Validated
15 July 2026
Published
15 July 2026
Comments close
31 August 2026

Case details on the Planning Authority website

Plans, case officer report and decision on eapps

Planning activity around 67, Triq it-Tliet Knejjes and, Wied Hal Balzan, Buontempo Estate, Balzan

157 other applications within 300 m: 101 granted, 2 refused, 12 pending. 98% of decided applications nearby were granted. Tallest granted nearby: 5 floors (PA/02867/25).

On Triq it-Tliet Knejjes: 17 other applications, 12 granted and 0 refused; granted buildings are typically 3 floors, the tallest 4. Periti active on this street: architecture 360, David Vassallo.

Approval estimate for sanctioning applications like this here: about 95% (likely range 65–100%, low reliability, from 39 comparable decisions nearby). Indicative only. It's based on decisions for similar nearby applications, not on the drawings or the case officer's report; it gets better as documents are added from eapps.

More by Mark Arrigo

All applications by Mark Arrigo

All planning applications in Balzan