propertylist

PA/05772/25: Demolition of existing dwelling in Santa Venera

84 and 86, Triq Abela, Santa Venera

Demolition of existing dwelling, excavation and construction of basement garage, with overlying domestic store, three levels of apartments and penthouse at setback floor. To omit condition 9 of PA/9475/18 in view that changes brought an increase in parking spaces and to include a condition that once the parking provision is constructed and completed, a refund will be issued for the equivalent of 2 parking spaces amounting to the sum of EUR5,000.

Status
Granted (This application has been approved by Planning Board / Commission.)
Location
84 and 86, Triq Abela, Santa Venera
Locality
Santa Venera
Applicant
Gordon Pisani
Perit
Perit Robert Sarsero
Application type
Full development permission
Zone
Within Development Zone
Type of works
Demolition & New Construction (Residential)
Height
4 floors plus a receded floor
Received
26 June 2025
Validated
10 September 2025
Published
10 September 2025
Comments close
10 October 2025
Recommendation
Refuse Permission
Decision
Grant Permission
Decision date
14 January 2026
Permit expires
28 January 2031

Premium: register with WhatsApp (free) on PropertyList to read what its planning file says: the case officer's recommendation, the reasons, conditions and consultations.

The public planning file has 32 documents: plans, reports, consultations and the decision.

Case details on the Planning Authority website

Plans, case officer report and decision on eapps

Planning activity around 84 and 86, Triq Abela, Santa Venera

229 other applications within 300 m: 157 granted, 3 refused, 17 pending. 98% of decided applications nearby were granted. Tallest granted nearby: 5 floors (PA/05235/24).

On Triq Abela: 22 other applications, 16 granted and 1 refused; granted buildings are typically 2 floors, the tallest 4. Periti active on this street: Kerstien Micallef, Charles Azzopardi, Samuel Formosa, Kyle Vella, Michelle Micallef Bugeja.

Approval estimate for demolition & new construction applications like this here: about 95% (likely range 65–100%, medium reliability, from 35 comparable decisions nearby). Indicative only. It's based on decisions for similar nearby applications, not on the drawings or the case officer's report; it gets better as documents are added from eapps.

More by Robert Sarsero

All applications by Robert Sarsero

All planning applications in Santa Venera