propertylist

PA/05796/23: sanction departures from PA/15/20 which changes include in St Julians

Valley Court and Bridge Flats, Triq il-Mensija, San Giljan

To sanction departures from PA/15/20 which changes include changes to the internal layout, correct site boundaries and changes in levels. To sanction departures from RG/861/21 which includes changes to the design of apertures at ground floor. Proposed internal and external alterations to dwellings approved in PA/15/20 and RG/861/21 and development of airspace having 1 two-bedroom apartment at third floor, 1 two-bedroom and 1 three-bedroom apartments at fourth floor, 1 three-bedroom apartment at fifth floor and 1 two-bedroom apartment at sixth floor. Proposal also includes the demolition of the roof of the structures at level 6 and changes to the facades.

Status
Granted (This application has been approved by Planning Board / Commission.)
Location
Valley Court and Bridge Flats, Triq il-Mensija, San Giljan
Locality
St Julians
Applicant
Kristian Calleja
Perit
Perit Gilbert Bartolo
Application type
Full development permission
Zone
Within Development Zone
Type of works
Sanctioning
Height
6 floors
Residential units
5
Received
30 May 2023
Validated
4 October 2023
Published
4 October 2023
Comments close
3 November 2023
Recommendation
Refuse Permission
Decision
Grant Permission
Decision date
29 November 2024
Permit expires
11 December 2029

Case details on the Planning Authority website

Plans, case officer report and decision on eapps

Planning activity around Valley Court and Bridge Flats, Triq il-Mensija, San Giljan

41 other applications on the same street: 20 granted, 3 refused, 6 pending. 87% of decided applications nearby were granted. Tallest granted nearby: 6 floors (PA/00079/26).

On Triq il-Mensija: 41 other applications, 20 granted and 3 refused; granted buildings are typically 6 floors, the tallest 6. Periti active on this street: Stephen Farrugia, Gilbert Bartolo, Anthea Huber, Daniel Attard, Nicholas Psaila-Savona.

Approval estimate for sanctioning applications like this here: about 86% (likely range 56–100%, low reliability, from 11 comparable decisions nearby). Indicative only. It's based on decisions for similar nearby applications, not on the drawings or the case officer's report; it gets better as documents are added from eapps.

More by Gilbert Bartolo

All applications by Gilbert Bartolo

More from Kristian Calleja

All planning applications in St Julians