propertylist

PA/04668/26: application seeks to revise the approved development in St Julians

Mercury House Project, Triq San Gorg c/w Triq Sant'Andrija c/w Triq Gdida fi Triq Sant'Andrija c/w, Triq Elija Zammit, San Giljan

The application seeks to revise the approved development (PA 5530/22) by expanding commercial and retail uses, including additional storage, a kitchen, and new Class 4D facilities at basement level, as well as increasing Class 4B retail floorspace within the mall and change of use from Class 4D to Class 4B at level 00. It also proposes a Class 4C kiosk with outdoor seating in the main piazza to enhance the public space. The proposal includes a reduction in the number of parking spaces, alongside minor internal alterations to the residential units, Class 4d outlets and hotel layout, and the installation of a canopy at the hotel entrance. Overall, the changes aim to improve functionality, support increased commercial activity, and enhance shared areas within the development.

Status
Pending (Screening Process)
Location
Mercury House Project, Triq San Gorg c/w Triq Sant'Andrija c/w Triq Gdida fi Triq Sant'Andrija c/w, Triq Elija Zammit, San Giljan
Locality
St Julians
Applicant
Mercury Towers Ltd. Attn: Joseph Portelli
Perit
Perit Annamaria Attard Montalto
Type of works
Change of Use
Received
25 March 2026

Case details on the Planning Authority website

Plans, case officer report and decision on eapps

Planning activity around Mercury House Project, Triq San Gorg c/w Triq Sant'Andrija c/w Triq Gdida fi Triq Sant'Andrija c/w, Triq Elija Zammit, San Giljan

78 other applications on the same street: 53 granted, 2 refused, 6 pending. 96% of decided applications nearby were granted. Tallest granted nearby: 10 floors (PA/04575/25).

On Triq San Gorg: 78 other applications, 53 granted and 2 refused; granted buildings are typically 7 floors, the tallest 10. Periti active on this street: David Vassallo, Colin Zammit, Christian Spiteri, Elena Borg Costanzi, Paul Camilleri.

Approval estimate for change of use applications like this here: about 94% (likely range 64–100%, low reliability, from 10 comparable decisions nearby). Indicative only. It's based on decisions for similar nearby applications, not on the drawings or the case officer's report; it gets better as documents are added from eapps.

More by Annamaria Attard Montalto

All applications by Annamaria Attard Montalto

More from Mercury Towers Ltd

All planning applications in St Julians