propertylist

PA/05118/23: demolition of existing building in St Julians

Montecarlo and vacant plot at, Triq Ball c/w, Triq il-Wilga, Paceville, San Giljan

Proposed demolition of existing building (Class 4D at basement level and ground floor level covered by PA/1578/21 and PA/6279/21 and Class 1 from first floor upwards covered by PA6279/21) and proposed extension of 3 Star BB Hotel (Class 3B) (covered by PA/10116/17 and PA/02186/23). Works include additions and alterations at all levels, extension of breakfast area at ground floor and basement -1, hotel accommodation from levels 1 to 9 (28 additional rooms) and additional pool at level 10. Proposal includes amendments to layout of 3 Star BB Hotel (Class 3B) from that approved in PA/10116/17 and PA/02186/23, including sanctioning of basement levels and parts of ground and first floor as built.

Status
Granted (This application has been approved by Planning Board / Commission.)
Location
Montecarlo and vacant plot at, Triq Ball c/w, Triq il-Wilga, Paceville, San Giljan
Locality
St Julians
Applicant
MAEK Ltd Attn: Etienne Saliba
Perit
Dr Pierre Farrugia
Application type
Full development permission
Zone
Within Development Zone
Type of works
Sanctioning
Height
10 floors
Residential units
28
Received
5 April 2023
Validated
30 August 2023
Published
30 August 2023
Comments close
29 September 2023
Recommendation
Grant Permission
Decision
Grant Permission
Decision date
3 November 2023
Permit expires
20 December 2028

Case details on the Planning Authority website

Plans, case officer report and decision on eapps

Planning activity around Montecarlo and vacant plot at, Triq Ball c/w, Triq il-Wilga, Paceville, San Giljan

6 other applications on the same street: 4 granted, 0 refused, 1 pending. 100% of decided applications nearby were granted. Tallest granted nearby: 11 floors (PA/02186/23).

On Triq Ball: 6 other applications, 4 granted and 0 refused; granted buildings are typically 10 floors, the tallest 11. Periti active on this street: Pierre Farrugia.

Approval estimate for sanctioning applications like this here: about 95% (likely range 65–100%, low reliability, from 1 comparable decision nearby). Indicative only. It's based on decisions for similar nearby applications, not on the drawings or the case officer's report; it gets better as documents are added from eapps.

More by Pierre Farrugia

All applications by Pierre Farrugia

More from MAEK Ltd

All planning applications in St Julians