propertylist

PA/05194/23: demolish existing building and to propose an in St Julians

San Juan, San Michel, 124A, 124B, 124C, 124D, Il Buco, Triq San Gorg c/w, Triq Gort, Paceville, San Giljan

To demolish existing building and to propose an extension to already approved Class 3B Hotel 110 rooms in total from first till eighth floor, To demolish, re-built and retain existing use of Class 4D restaurant and Class 4B shop at ground floor level, class 4a offices at first floor level and underlying linked basements (6 levels in total) including amenities to the hotel and car spaces, alterations to already approved corner site in PA 3061/22 and PA3637/21

Status
Granted (This application has been approved by Planning Board / Commission.)
Location
San Juan, San Michel, 124A, 124B, 124C, 124D, Il Buco, Triq San Gorg c/w, Triq Gort, Paceville, San Giljan
Locality
St Julians
Applicant
Approved Limited Attn: Daniel Farrugia
Perit
Perit Colin Zammit
Application type
Full development permission
Zone
Within Development Zone
Type of works
Demolition & New Construction (Commercial)
Height
8 floors plus a receded floor
Received
5 May 2023
Validated
30 August 2023
Published
30 August 2023
Comments close
29 September 2023
Recommendation
Grant Permission
Decision
Grant Permission
Decision date
18 October 2024
Permit expires
30 October 2029

Case details on the Planning Authority website

Plans, case officer report and decision on eapps

Planning activity around San Juan, San Michel, 124A, 124B, 124C, 124D, Il Buco, Triq San Gorg c/w, Triq Gort, Paceville, San Giljan

78 other applications on the same street: 52 granted, 2 refused, 7 pending. 96% of decided applications nearby were granted. Tallest granted nearby: 10 floors (PA/04575/25).

On Triq San Gorg: 78 other applications, 52 granted and 2 refused; granted buildings are typically 7 floors, the tallest 10. Periti active on this street: David Vassallo, Colin Zammit, Christian Spiteri, Elena Borg Costanzi, Paul Camilleri.

Approval estimate for demolition & new construction applications like this here: about 95% (likely range 65–100%, low reliability, from 5 comparable decisions nearby). Indicative only. It's based on decisions for similar nearby applications, not on the drawings or the case officer's report; it gets better as documents are added from eapps.

More by Colin Zammit

All applications by Colin Zammit

More from Approved Ltd

All planning applications in St Julians