propertylist

PA/05562/25: Demolition of the existing roof structure and in Attard

58, Daddy's Court, Triq il-Pitkali, Attard

Demolition of the existing roof structure and extension by two floors to construct two apartments per floor, two 3-bedroom units on the fourth floor and two 2-bedroom units on the receded floor. The proposal also includes the construction of a pool at roof level, the installation of PV panels, and alterations to the existing façade, as shown in the proposed elevation.

Status
Granted (This application has been approved by Planning Board / Commission.)
Location
58, Daddy's Court, Triq il-Pitkali, Attard
Locality
Attard
Applicant
Warren Piscopo
Perit
Perit George Farrugia
Application type
Full development permission
Zone
Within Development Zone
Type of works
Demolition & New Construction (Residential)
Height
5 floors plus a receded floor
Residential units
4
Received
31 July 2025
Validated
22 October 2025
Published
22 October 2025
Comments close
21 November 2025
Recommendation
Refuse Permission
Decision
Grant Permission
Decision date
19 February 2026

Premium: register with WhatsApp (free) on PropertyList to read what its planning file says: the case officer's recommendation, the reasons, conditions and consultations.

The public planning file has 35 documents: plans, reports, consultations and the decision.

Case details on the Planning Authority website

Plans, case officer report and decision on eapps

Planning activity around 58, Daddy's Court, Triq il-Pitkali, Attard

80 other applications within 300 m: 42 granted, 0 refused, 10 pending. 100% of decided applications nearby were granted. Tallest granted nearby: 5 floors (PA/05677/24).

On Triq il-Pitkali: 17 other applications, 10 granted and 0 refused; granted buildings are typically 4 floors, the tallest 5. Periti active on this street: Neil Felice, Kleaven Maniscalco.

Approval estimate for demolition & new construction applications like this here: about 95% (likely range 65–100%, low reliability, from 10 comparable decisions nearby). Indicative only. It's based on decisions for similar nearby applications, not on the drawings or the case officer's report; it gets better as documents are added from eapps.

More by George Farrugia

All applications by George Farrugia

All planning applications in Attard